Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother |
| From | ?jevind L?ng |
| Date | 2002-05-16 10:39 (2002-05-16 10:39) |
| Message-ID | <%eKE8.4790$iB4.14044@nntpserver.swip.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | Bagronk the Happy Orc |
Bagronk the Happy Orc wrote:
Bagronk the Happy OrcOh, Jesus, how I long for getting broadband. My condo was supposed to do that two years ago, and they still have not managed to come to a decision. I suppose I'll simply have to act unilaterally.
I found some words from "?jevind L?ng" <ojevind.lang@swipnet.se>in my phone cable...
[snip]
from?jevind L?ng
Not to say that you are wrong about Kuwait; but rescuing the Kuwaitis
itthat blood-stained megalomaniac in Bagdad was a good thing to do. That it also served America's best interests is an additional case in its favour;
No, if it hadn't been for the oil, America would not have bothered to act. Still, that does not make the intervention in Kuwait a bad thing. It was a good thing, in my opinion.does not mysteriously nullify ther fact that the Kuwaitis were liberated.Bagronk the Happy Orc
Admitted. But the question is whether that "liberation" aspect alone would have been enough. If that was the cause, leaving Saddam in power and letting him bash down the Kurds in northern Iraq would have been highly illogical.
?jevind
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
