Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
| From | paulh |
| Date | 2002-04-19 07:22 (2002-04-19 07:22) |
| Message-ID | <k9avbusv902j6bqra2b0snrj4f3u5rur1e@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | David Flood |
| Followups | David Flood (12h & 12m) |
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:32:37 +0100, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>wrote:
David FloodThe point is that they have never 'attacked' an 'area'. But it comes back to definitions in the end i guess...
"paulh" <paulh@fahncahn.com>wrote in message news:9g5ubuoc24kemneh4m2j7rgg8qld67ern9@4ax.com...paulhDavid Flood
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:43:05 GMT, "TradeSurplus"
<tradesurplus@hotmail.com>paulhDavid Flood
wrote:them back.Can you prove that this occurred or is just perhaps a slight exaggeration...TradeSurplus
Bloody Sunday is only once incident of many in which the British Army
killedDavid FloodTradeSurplus
nationalist civilians. The British Army does not have to try to kill
everyDavid FloodTradeSurpluspaulh
single person for it to be an attack.
But they'd probably have to kill more than 20 a year for it to be
considered anpaulhDavid Flood
'attack'..
How many, would you guess?
Indeed they did... pity that Cromwell was such a bastard, eh?paulhDavid Flood
My issue is that the word attack is somewhat harsh considering their legal right to be there
And they also had an assumed legal 'right' to traverse the rest of the country, once upon a time...
paulh
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
