Russ
In article <1m2ebuo2k0om7d8i6piq30u3ooisr7s5g1@4ax.com>, paulh <paulh@fahncahn.com>writes:

paulh
So true... Israel was being attacked from there in 1967 so its only right that they can brutalise civilians in that area 35 years later. Might is Right

all..

Russ
Might does not make right. But, of course, sometimes might is right.

Anyway...what civilians are being brutalized? The same civilians, a vast majority of which, support and condone suicide bombers?

The Palestinians could have had a state 54 years ago. But no they

They could have had a state anytime between 1948 and 1967 had Egypt and

seen fit to give them the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Not only didn't

so, they attacked ISrael instead. They could have had a state when Prime Minister Barak offered one to them a few years ago. But no, they would

kill Israeli civilians. The Palestinians have yet to show they have joined

civilized world. What could have been a Palestinian state is now a

ruin because Arafat refused to make peace with Barak and the Palestinain

agreed with Arafat. Plain and simple.

How many times was Israel supposed to be attacked? 5? 10? 20? At what

does Israel have a right to say, 'Enough'. At what point are the justified

looking out for their own security first? According to those who think

you, apparently the answer is never.