Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | David Flood |
Date | 2002-04-16 21:02 (2002-04-16 20:02) |
Message-ID | <a9hvio$3f1fm$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Russ |
Followups | Morgil Blackhope (1h & 57m) Russ (20h & 46m) |
Russold
In article <a9d3v1$28jte$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de>, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>writes:And Barak tried it. What did he get for his trouble? The PalestiniansDavid Flood
went towar and ensured his defeat in favor of Sharon.Describing the Palestinians as having "gone to war" is rather startling. Are you referring to the entire population; mothers, children, toothless
revolutionarygrandfathers?
Or do you mean the religious fundamentalist nuts and extremist
thetypes carrying out a heinous indiscriminate terrorist campaign against
Let's apply the logic of this fully.population of Israel (not just Jews).Russ
Let's start with the 77% who support homicide bombings.
where aDavid Flood
If the latter, then I'll have to refer you to modern Irish history -
its'splinter of Fenianism (crazed beyond all reason) has always carried on
No - there's a whole 'backstory' to how the writing was on the wall for the Irish Party even then, when it became clear that the Brits had no real intentions of granting even Home Rule. I can give you a decent account of what I'm talking about, if you want, but it'll take a long and detailed post to cover.own private war with the British state, even when the rest of the contemporary 'movement' has achieved acceptable terms.Russ
Hmmmm. That might describe the class of 1916 as well.
Anyway, could these 'splinters of Fenianism' claim 77% support?Depends on what you mean by support. Ordinary decent people caught in a hopeless situation can bring themselves to support anything.
BTW, when exactly did they become crazed? Were they crazed in 1969, 1970, sometime later?I'd say the turning-point came in the enraged killing-spree after the massacre of civil rights marchers on Bloody Sunday. *That* was the turning point in the Troubles.
andDavid Flood
Arafat, I suspect, is in the same boat - there will *always* be some fragment of Palestinian society harbouring the aim of evicting the Jews,
How do you know? Relying on what the Israelis say isn't a guarentee of absolute truthfulness and impartiality.which will be largely beyond his power to prevent.Russ
He's not even trying.
themDavid Flood
What we've learned is that the only way to marginalise this faction is to show the people that politics is working, and for that you need the stability of an intact PA, not the Israelis shooting up anyone who wears a headscarf and looks at
the PAthe wrong way.Russ
It was working. Tons of investment and economic developement. Arafat and
threw it away by restarting the intifadah.Sharon and his buddies in the Israeli right would have found some excuse, probably through the ongoing colonization of Palestinian lands.
IIn this thread, I've been in the position of defending Sharon, although
I haven't seen that.David FloodRuss
donot particularly like him. What I object to are those who say they Palestinians rightfully object to negotiating with him.Who said this?
A certain poster with the initial CD.
*spectacularly*.Even more so because it was the Palestinians who got Sharon elected.David Flood
Urr, no, I think that that's actually the Israeli citizens who voted for him, after Peres and Barak screwed the peace process up so
RussBarak *wasn't* offering a state, in fact it was nothing like what Rabin had been understood to have agreed. No-one could have agreed to that, in perpetuity.
How, by offering them a state?
ethnicare a *quite* nasty bunch, who obviously much prefer a good ol' war, followed by some
Theycleansing, as a solution to their problems.This is precisely why I have little sympathy for the Palestinians.
topurposefully caused Barak, the Labor PM who was negotiating with them,
thereforeDavid Flood
losethe election and they themselves caused Sharon to win. They are
blamingreaping precisely what they sowed.I think Barak lost the election himself.
I would also be *quite* reluctant to state also that any people 'brought' something on themselves - if you go down that route, then you start
something'all' Afrikaaners, 'all' Ulster-Scots, or 'all' Jews (or even 'all' Americans!), for the failures of their respective political and societal establishments.
And that's when you start on the slippery slope of yourself doing
Thank you for reinforcing my point for me.quite awful to *them*.Russ
Ask Bomber Harris and Winston Churchill. (Or Harry Truman)