Skip to main content
news

Re: Evolution

anon
SubjectRe: Evolution
Fromanon
Date2002-04-19 00:50 (2002-04-18 18:50)
Message-ID<3CBF4DCD.B28E7725@nowhere.com>
Client
Newsgroupsalt.fan.tolkien
FollowsMarc A. Moniz

"Marc A. Moniz" wrote:

Marc A. Moniz
Yes, this is a common misconception. Scientific theories are not speculations or even well-supported hypotheses. A scientific theory is a coherent body of interconnected statements, strongly supported by evidence and based on reasoning that exaplains observations or phenomena. It is a complex of statements and thus does not stand or fall on the basis of a single critical test. Theories evolve as they are confronted with new data. Parts of the theory may be discarded or modified and new parts may be added as new information is gathered. It is the best explanation that we have based on the evidence that we have at the time, whether it's the Wave Theory or Particle Theory; the String Theory, Bubble Theory, or Big Bang Theory; or if it's Lamarkism, Darwinsim, or the Modern Synthesis.

"I wouldn't believe in anything if it wasn't for my lucky astrology mood ring."

Steve Martin, circa 1979

--

anon

------------------------------------------------------------

"I find some of the webbies to be very entertaining, & they are most enjoyable when tossed by their tails for distance."

Something I read on a newsgroup once

------------------------------------------------------------