Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
| From | David Flood |
| Date | 2002-04-16 21:11 (2002-04-16 20:11) |
| Message-ID | <a9i03i$3e0b3$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | TradeSurplus |
"TradeSurplus" <tradesurplus@hotmail.com>wrote in message news:oh_u8.12867$xS2.3759161436@newssvr10.news.prodigy.com...
TradeSurplus<snip>
Russ wrote ...RussTradeSurplus
Tamim writes:TamimRuss
Yeah, but it's different. They expanded their territories in their neighborhoood, but they didn't establish colonies in lands previously occupied by "inferior" people.
Is there any particular reason conquest followed by occupation is any
betterRuss
than conquest followed by occupation and colonization?
TradeSurplusknow
This is a bad thing. I won't explain in this post why the destruction of an entire people is a bad thing because I hope that you
why already. If not, let me know and I'll explain further.Refer to A. Hitler for details.
D.
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
