Subject | Re: The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an offence in Eng |
From | Michael O'Neill |
Date | 2002-04-21 21:03 (2002-04-21 20:03) |
Message-ID | <3CC30D03.948F9729@indigo.ie> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | paulh |
Followups | David Flood (2h & 27m) > Michael O'Neill John Evans (14h & 39m) > Michael O'Neill |
paulhThe IRA have issued a statement denying their involvement. Say what you like about the Continuity IRA, the Real IRA, or any other shade of Republicanism, the actual IRA have never been shown to state other than facts AFAICR.
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:33:33 +0100, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>wrote:paulhas aDavid Flood
the PSNI (the new squeaky-clean RUC, mar dhe?) has yet to issue so muchofmugshot to the public, preferring instead to have the usual 'anonymous sources' mutter dark rumours about an imaginary crack Provo gang.
Instead, it appears to have seized the excuse to turn Nationalist partsol'Northern Ireland upside down, perhaps in a nostalgic mood for the goodDavid Flooddays...Russ
Can you imagine if the IRA were actually *that* good?
There would have been a united Ireland 20 years ago.
This tale of "the IRA did it" requires such a massive suspension of disbelief that I'd be surprised if any person with a modicum of intelligence and an open mind (obviously, Davy Trimble excludes himself on at least one count) could take it seriously.
Ya know...when I heard about I just accepted it was who they said it was (the IRA). But it did strike me as curious.. it was too ..I dunno.. esoteric, too easy, too wild and crazy...its not like I'd ever head of them doing this before, and the timing seemed wrong too. 10 years ago mebbe, now.. no, kinda pointless.
So I was inteested to hear this alternative view, one I had never considered, cos it sounds more right.. not that I can really statewhy..