Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of england) has died) |
From | David Flood |
Date | 2002-04-03 21:46 (2002-04-03 20:46) |
Message-ID | <a8fpae$s84mu$1@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien,alt.uk.law,uk.current-events.general,uk.legal,uk.politics.constitution |
Follows | Matthew M. Huntbach |
Followups | Russ (1h & 32m) > David Flood Halmyre (18h & 51m) jeremy_thorpe@hotmail.com (22h & 48m) |
Matthew M. Huntbachnews:<a8a5lk$qoig1$1@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de>...
Chris (webmaster@netpub.net) wrote:Chris
"David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>wrote in message
againstDavid Flood
On a related note, I believe that 'The Guardian' is taking a test case against a UK law (dating from the mid-nineteenth century) making it an offence to advocate a republic.ChrisMatthew M. Huntbach
I think you are reading slightly too much into the whole "treason" thing. Even in England we're talking more about "selling government secrets to other countries" treason, rather than: "Saying the Royal family sucks" treason. British people can say anything they want about the royal family.
A staple filler of newspaper columns and chat shows is to find archaic laws that are still on the statute book though no-one these days takes them seriously. The USA is a particularly ripe source of such things, seeing as each state makes its laws, so there's a lot to choose from.
The UK (or English - it predates the union with Scotland) Treason law is this sort of law. In theory, it's a serious matter to advocate the end of the monarchy. In practice, the state never takes legal action
the many people who do.And yet it's still on the statute books.