Google| Subject | Re: Evolution |
| From | the softrat |
| Date | 2002-04-18 02:31 (2002-04-17 17:31) |
| Message-ID | <dj4sbu8u3ddiaqslv5hh0l43t1snkh3f0o@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | Ermanna |
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:43:14 -0400, Ermanna <Ermanna@erols.com>wrote:
ErmannaI would not say 'terrified', merely 'resistant'. Although a true scientist realizes the necessity to validate past results with new or repeated experiments, it is not necessary to waste time and confuse the students (they're probably confused enough already) by teaching non-scientific dogma as scientific. 'creationism' is not scientific; it is religious dogma with no known evidence outside of certain religious teachings.
Of course, evolutionist are also terrified of letting creationism _into_ the classroom. I wonder why?
If you know of any, please enlighten me.
On the other hand, ....
(oh, forget it!)
the softrat "He who rubs owls" mailto:softrat@pobox.com -- Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
