Google| Subject | Re: Queen mother (of england) has died |
| From | David Flood |
| Date | 2002-04-02 20:13 (2002-04-02 19:13) |
| Message-ID | <a8cvfk$rao5k$1@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | g.skinner |
| Followups | AC (56m) > David Flood g.skinner (19h & 16m) > David Flood |
"g.skinner" <nomail@nomail.co.uk>wrote in message news:7Ghq8.5311$Np3.802793@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
g.skinner<snip>
David Flood <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>wrote in message news:a8aam0$qloht$1@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de...David Flood
"g.skinner" <nomail@nomail.co.uk>wrote in message news:SCyp8.24882$gj7.4127631@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
Ig.skinner
But then you're an arsehole with putrid shit for brains. As a royalist
<slap>How do *you* think? How do we provide proof for *anything* that has happened before?g.skinnertake offence at your comments, just fuck off to alt.republican.losersDavid Flood
Care to produce a reasoned excuse to *this* (for example), skinner?
Queen Mum wanted peace with Hitler
How can someone produce proof for something that may or may not have been said over 60 years ago?
My personally belief and thats all that can be given by anyone, is that she would not have wanted a monarchy under nazi rule.The first priority of royalty, *always*, is to preserve their own institution, no matter the cost. I could give you a *long* list of examples, even from WWII.
But however I may see this, you obviously have a blinkered republican view of things and nothing would change that.Logic isn't your strong point, is it?
Obviously, by 'being' republican, I am entirely against the notion of monarchs, emperors, grand dukes yadayadayada. If I wasn't, then I would obviously *not* be a republican.
QED, I should think.
David
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
