Subject | Re: The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an offence in Eng |
From | ?jevind L?ng |
Date | 2002-04-23 13:39 (2002-04-23 13:39) |
Message-ID | <gKbx8.2369$iB4.6820@nntpserver.swip.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Mike Scott Rohan |
Followups | Jon Hall (2h & 28m) Michael O'Neill (6h & 49m) David Flood (8h & 43m) Flame of the West (4d, 11h & 17m) > ?jevind L?ng |
Mike Scott RohanAgreed. Also (to tie onto another extremist contention), shooting a policeman or a soldier in the back is, in my book, just as much an act of terrorism as detonating a bomb in a pub or a supermarket or at an open-air concert. What does greenwash mean, by the way?
To judge by previous exchanges here, you needn't apologise too profusely. The current line for extremist republicans is "Of course I don't approve of the IRA's methods, *but*..." That routine denial made, they're free to parrot the IRA version of history, invented to greenwash those methods. All carefully obscuring one awkward little truth -- the IRA's means and the IRA's ends are one and the same. Terrorist weapons kill completely innocent people, because they're meant to; they don't work otherwise. But speaking that magic line transforms these people from blinkered racist fanatics to saddened observers. In their mirrors, anyhow; and they're not given to looking anywhere else.