Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | TradeSurplus |
Date | 2002-04-15 19:18 (2002-04-15 19:18) |
Message-ID | <BXDu8.12696$_P1.3692563482@newssvr10.news.prodigy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Russ |
Russdoesn't
Jay Random writes:Jay Random
TradeSurplus wrote:Israel's leadership is brutal and evil. The fact that it is elected
againstmake it less brutal or evil. The fact that still more brutal and evil leaderships exist in the region neither lessens nor excuses the evil of Israel's leadership. And drop the "moral equivalence" strawman. I'm not going to argue
infigments of your imagination. Evil is not made less evil just by being
lessthe presence of a greater evil. Saruman is evil. The fact that he is
andevil than Sauron does not make him a good guy. Substitute "Israeli leadership" and "Arab leadership" for Saruman and Sauron respectively
My analogy is correct in that it properly illustrates my opinion of the situation. If you disagree with my opinion you may choose a different analogy to illustrate yours. Analogy is, of course, no argument. It is merely a useful tool to show what the poster means.Russyou can see what I am actually arguing, rather than your own strawman.If you recognize that the Palestinian leadership is more evil than Israel's, & thus presumably that their acts are more evil, why do you persist in taking their side against the Israelis?
Trade's Saruman/Sauron analogy is flawed. A better analogy might be Denethor/Sauron.