Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
| From | David Flood |
| Date | 2002-04-19 19:35 (2002-04-19 18:35) |
| Message-ID | <a9pnjp$5c6gr$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | paulh |
"paulh" <paulh@fahncahn.com>wrote in message news:k9avbusv902j6bqra2b0snrj4f3u5rur1e@4ax.com...
paulhslight
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:32:37 +0100, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>wrote:David Flood
"paulh" <paulh@fahncahn.com>wrote in message news:9g5ubuoc24kemneh4m2j7rgg8qld67ern9@4ax.com...paulhDavid Flood
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:43:05 GMT, "TradeSurplus"
<tradesurplus@hotmail.com>paulh
wrote:them back.Can you prove that this occurred or is just perhaps a
topaulhDavid Floodexaggeration...TradeSurplus
Bloody Sunday is only once incident of many in which the British Army
killedDavid FloodTradeSurplus
nationalist civilians. The British Army does not have to try to kill
everyDavid FloodTradeSurpluspaulh
single person for it to be an attack.
But they'd probably have to kill more than 20 a year for it to be
considered anpaulhDavid Flood
'attack'..
How many, would you guess?
The point is that they have never 'attacked' an 'area'. But it comes back
definitions in the end i guess...No, *your* point was that you think that it's OK for the British Army to kill innocent Catholic citizens.
Nice of you to show such sensitivity. How do you regard Abo's, Japs and Slinks, btw?paulhMy issue is that the word attack is somewhat harsh considering their legal right to be thereDavid Flood
And they also had an assumed legal 'right' to traverse the rest of the country, once upon a time...
Indeed they did... pity that Cromwell was such a bastard, eh?
D.
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
