Skip to main content
news

Re: Evolution

Ville Salo
Google Google
SubjectRe: Evolution
FromVille Salo
Date2002-04-17 22:37 (2002-04-17 23:37)
Message-ID<8umrbus5e3sj1ptvcrvhs9q0es6gf4is5m@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsalt.fan.tolkien
FollowsErmanna
FollowupsErmanna (2d, 1h & 33m)
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:43:14 -0400, Ermanna <Ermanna@erols.com>wrote:

Ermanna
No one is debating microevolution.

macroevolution is just microevolution many times in a row.

Of course, evolutionist are also terrified of letting creationism _into_ the classroom. I wonder why?

Because it has no scientific basis, that's why.

We have more science on our side than you do.

Ha. There are no new research that would point to creation rather than evolution (there are a lot of research that can be explained by both theories) Creationist theories have made no predictions about the nature of future foundings, whereas evolutionary theory has.

Microevolution is. Macroevolution isn't.

Microevolution is macroevolution.

-- Ville Salo ville.salo(at)uta.fi

Google
Ermanna (2d, 1h & 33m)