Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | Morgil Blackhope |
Date | 2002-04-15 16:52 (2002-04-15 17:52) |
Message-ID | <a9epf5$2ebj7$1@ID-81911.news.dfncis.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Russ |
Followups | Russ (47m) |
Russ
In article <a9dbi7$28ss4$1@ID-81911.news.dfncis.de>, "Morgil Blackhope" <morestelx@hotmail.com>writes:
PalestiniansMorgil BlackhopeRuss
You don't think that had anything to do with Barak saying one thing and doing exactly opposite?
Boy that would be an incredible case of pot kettle black if the
made that argument.Exactly. That argument has been used so many times against Palestineans, I thought it would be time to remind that they're not the only ones doing it.
I think he only subscribes to RABT, but thanks for dodging.Morgil BlackhopeRuss
Answer this: If Barak honestly wanted peace with Palestineans, why did he kept building illegal settlements on their lands, more then any other PM before him?
(And please, nothing about how Israel had a right to do that because they won, or that Palestineans deserved it. Just simply, what were his motives?)
Ask him.
You've dodged that main point. Whatever problems the Palestinians may havehad
with Barak, he was infinitely better than Sharon.Your point is based on false assumption. The Palestineans do not elect PM for Israel. If the Israelians were naiive enough to think that Sharon's way would bring them peace and security it is not Palestineans fault. Sharon is Israel's choice and Israel's responsibility.