Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
| From | Tamim |
| Date | 2002-04-17 18:50 (2002-04-17 18:50) |
| Message-ID | <a9k93o$oi8$1@oravannahka.helsinki.fi> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | paulh |
| Followups | paulh (13m) > Tamim |
paulh <paulh@fahncahn.com>wrote:
paulhThere is no official definition.
What utter rubbish. Can you show me anywhere credible, other than in your opinion, where terrorist forces are defined as those which only kill X% or more of 'civilians' vs combatants..
SO what ratio needs to be aspired to for THIS then? Perhaps if the Loyalist Paramilitaries kill more 'combatants' then you'll be happy to take them off the list of 'Terrorists'.. What a pathetic excuse to justify terrorism..Partly I have to side with Russ. Every army, when in war, kills it's own share of civilians.
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
