Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | paulh |
Date | 2002-04-17 19:03 (2002-04-17 19:03) |
Message-ID | <bkarbugiku6547237gssi8aombgul2080r@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Tamim |
Followups | David Flood (25m) > paulh Russ (21m) > paulh Tamim (2h & 31m) > paulh |
TamimUsually when wearing a uniform of some sort and belonging to some sort of recognised government. Sneaking around in civilian clothes kinda changes things....
paulh <paulh@fahncahn.com>wrote:paulhTamim
What utter rubbish. Can you show me anywhere credible, other than in your opinion, where terrorist forces are defined as those which only kill X% or more of 'civilians' vs combatants..
There is no official definition.paulhTamim
SO what ratio needs to be aspired to for THIS then? Perhaps if the Loyalist Paramilitaries kill more 'combatants' then you'll be happy to take them off the list of 'Terrorists'.. What a pathetic excuse to justify terrorism..
Partly I have to side with Russ. Every army, when in war, kills it's own share of civilians.