Subject | Re: The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an offence in Eng |
From | ?jevind L?ng |
Date | 2002-04-28 10:00 (2002-04-28 10:00) |
Message-ID | <E_Ny8.3015$iB4.8387@nntpserver.swip.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Flame of the West |
Followups | Flame of the West (6h & 24m) > ?jevind L?ng Russ (10h & 25m) |
Flame of the WestIf the Baader-Meinhof gang shot a policeman or a soldier (in the back or in the stomach) that was regarded as terrorism. In my opinion, that goes for all terrorist movements. We seem to define terrorism differently, which makes further discussion of the subejct pointless.
So shooting a British soldier in the front is OK but in the back makes you a terrorist?
The definitions of terrorism I've seen concern the people you choose as targets, not the part of the anatomy you aim at.