Google| Subject | Re: Queen mother (of england) has died |
| From | paulh |
| Date | 2002-04-01 13:03 (2002-04-01 13:03) |
| Message-ID | <3bfgauol2q61oh518o1eco7u472ppd8lpr@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | teepee |
| Followups | teepee (1h & 42m) > paulh |
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:29:15 +0100, "teepee" <gidjo@hotmailsp.amcom> wrote:
teepeeWell written? Its the usual 'measure past acts by current standards' diatribe. Even his first conjecture "Her death marks the end of an antidemocratic era " is unproven in the article and sufficiently vague enough so its unproveable, indefenible and undeniable all at the same time. You're just a knee-jerk anti.. you know... 'if everyone thinks A then I'll think B..cos I'm a rebel I am...'
"paulh" <aa@microsoft.com>wrotepaulhteepee
Good idea.. back down and run away...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/queenmother/article/0,2763,677164,00.html
This well written Christopher Hitchens article broadly reflects my views, though it's somewhat understandably restrained. I hope you enjoy reading it.
Keep reading Christopher Hitchins for any other opinions you may need.
paulh
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
