Subject | Re: The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an offence in Eng |
From | David Flood |
Date | 2002-04-23 23:10 (2002-04-23 22:10) |
Message-ID | <aa4lo4$7rd28$1@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Michael O'Neill |
Followups | Laurie Forbes (4h & 7m) > David Flood Michael O'Neill (17h & 49m) Mike Scott Rohan (1d, 14h & 40m) > David Flood |
Michael O'Neillas you
Russ wrote a nasty piece in response to MSR - the truth:RussMichael O'Neill
In article <2002042311522471187@asgard.zetnet.co.uk>, Mike Scott Rohan <mike.scott.rohan@asgard.zetnet.co.uk>writes:
<snip>Russ
If you want to take the position that means=ends, that is fine as long
you don'tapply it equally to the British and Northern Irish states. I suspect
of thosedo that however, making you a hypocrite.Using the 'means' employed by the British security services, over half
analysiskilled by them were completely innocent people. Does your means=ends
Seemingly knot... http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/mike.scott.rohan/images/biog/mikephiz.jpg.apply to that stark fact or *are* you a hypocrite?Michael O'NeillMike Scott RohanRuss
Terrorist weapons kill completely innocent people, because they're meant to; they don't work otherwise.
Don't be absurd. All weapons kill completely innocent people.Mike Scott RohanRuss
But speaking that magic line transforms these people from blinkered racist fanatics to saddened observers. In their mirrors, anyhow; and they're not given to looking anywhere else.
Another conclusion markedly lacking in facts.
<tsk! tsk! tsk!>
Nasty, nasty, *nasty* boy! Telling MSR truth like that could start him off on one of his royalist apoplectic fits.
<shakes head>
You'll be the death of him. He's not getting any younger you know...