Subject | Re: The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an offence in Eng |
From | Mike Scott Rohan |
Date | 2002-04-29 15:02 (2002-04-29 14:02) |
Message-ID | <2002042914025071187@asgard.zetnet.co.uk> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | paulh |
paulhThat's sadly right, and when you think about it, it isn't so curious, it's sadly inevitable. Terrorists and their groupies are defending indefensible atrocities and rationalizing irrational hatreds, so they can't for a moment admit that any kind of objective criticism is even possible. It always has to come from their enemy, open or concealed. Only being a hundred per cent right could justify such atrocities. The moment they allowed even a possibility that might not be so, their entire rationale would collapse, because only outward self-righteousness -- whatever writhing mess of racial or political or other hatreds it conceals -- will support it. If there's even a possibility they could reasonably be wrong, they would be unjustified. Admit that one crack of rational daylight and their whole shadowy edifice of hates comes tumbling down. They can't do anything else; it's in the nature of the beast.
Curiosly enuf when I played the 'anti' line.. anti some Israeli 'actions' and anti 'IRA' 'freedom fighters' there was some assumption that I must therefore be supporting the Other Sides. It took quite a few posts for my viewpoint to sink in that I'm against both sides in 'wars of terror'. And that was probably the most telling assumption of the lot, that to be AGAINST one side you must be FOR the other, and thus the battle lines are drawn.....