Mike Scott Rohan
The message <3CD045A4.E02462F7@indigo.ie> from Michael O'Neill <onq@indigo.ie>contains these words:

Mike Scott Rohan wrote:

[Lots of whinging begrudgery and basic acceptance of my position]

No whinging, just reasoned argument pointing out some contradictions in your position. Which you make no attempt whatever to answer.

I see you had neither the courage, the grace nor the ability to post evidence supporting your "terrorist" allegations against David Flood.

Since he can't produce anything other than bile and petty abuse, why should anyone think him worth answering? He's been killfiled for some time. But most of what I say could be applied to him also.

You are the only one alleging terrorism is going on here, Mike. No one else. Put up or shut up.

You're a fine one to say that. I'm not "alleging terrorism is going on here", as you know perfectly well;

and I have put up.

You, on the other hand, have once again slithered right past my most important question -- given your professed opposition to terrorist killing, would you then turn in any terrorist you knew was responsible? If you wouldn't, then how valid is that opposition? You've had two chances to put up now, and wasted them; so by your own standards you should do the other thing.

Or else be labelled all over Usenet as a Bigoted Prat.

Typical -- no response but threats. And you calling anyone a bigoted prat is pretty rich.

Descending to this sort of thing forfeits my interest entirely. I'm going to go and read some Tolkien now; you could do worse. Another point you avoided answering is what you could possibly get out of Tolkien, whose values are so fundamentally opposed to yours.

This is a Tolkien group, and it should be kept that way.