Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | Russ |
Date | 2002-04-18 23:40 (2002-04-18 23:40) |
Message-ID | <20020418174034.01774.00001571@mb-cg.aol.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | paulh |
Followups | paulh (7h & 39m) > Russ |
See, isn't is nice to be able to use statistics when they support your argument. <g>Well, as I pointed out in another message from 1969-1974, British security services killed 117 civilians, only 13 of which were the civilians shot deadpaulh
onBloody Sunday.I don't doubt it..but if an army chose to 'attack an area' how many casualties would really occur?. If they had attacked the area then 104 dead in 5 years is a pretty bad record, thats 21 per year not, one every 2-3 days, not nice, but hardly a massacre. You should be able to do that in 1/2 an hour if they were attacked in the true nature of attack...hell the Americans unfortunately did that with one bomb in Ameriyah in Baghdad.
So no, I don't believe the British Army attacked nationalist areas. the figures don't add up do they?