Google| Subject | Re: The Old Blood talks ...[was Re: The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an off |
| From | ?jevind L?ng |
| Date | 2002-04-25 08:39 (2002-04-25 08:39) |
| Message-ID | <fxNx8.2760$iB4.7340@nntpserver.swip.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien,rec.arts.books.tolkien |
| Follows | Michael O'Neill |
| Followups | Michael O'Neill (6h & 44m) David Flood (18h & 51m) |
Michael O'Neill geschrieb:
Michael O'Neill[snip]
?jevind L?ng wrote:
[snipalot]?jevind L?ngMichael O'Neill
Michael, as you presumably know, heredity is not carried through the blood - it is carried by the genes.
<snip sight Ojay imploding and backpedaling with scant provocation from me>
I was tempted to write YHBT and just leave it at that Ojay, as a prelude to doing a Floodser and taking the piss out of you for weeks hereafter, but I decided not to. Instead I decided to wind you up even more with some FACTS.
I must say I am baffled by your post. My contention was that there is no such thing as "Celtic blood" (or "Germanic blood" or "Sanskrit blood" or "Gipsy blood" or whatever). You react with a long note providing more information that supports what I say and behave as if you have somehow shown me wrong. Yes, I know that Flood has been stalking me for weeks. So has Russ, for that matter. Unlike you, I don't think it is funny. Since we seem to be in complete agreement about the nonexistence of such a thing as Celtic blood, I don't see any need for further discussion.
?jevind L?ng
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
