Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | paulh |
Date | 2002-04-18 21:14 (2002-04-18 21:14) |
Message-ID | <th6ubu4ak9odi2qsu0boo4cpnid5n9fm2u@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | TradeSurplus |
Followups | TradeSurplus (3h & 34m) |
TradeSurplusSorry... not going to do your homework for you. Russ and I are already coming to some sort of semi-agreement on this. I'm not going to start all over again, you'll have to work it out for yourself and try and keep up the pace.
paulh wrote in message ...paulhTradeSurplus
On 18 Apr 2002 17:07:28 GMT, mcresq@aol.com (Russ) wrote:Russ
Maybe using the Socratic method we can come up with a workable definition
ofTradeSurplusRusspaulh
terrorism for you. <g>
I already have one...
So tell us what it is already? I posted my definition. Russ posted his. Why can't you post yours? Take as long as you like. Don't feel limited to a single paragraph. Just tell us what you are using yourself, personally, to decide whether a particular action is a terrorist action or a particular organization a terrorist organization.
Just so you don't feel lonely, here's mine again: A terrorist act is one that uses covert operations to attack an enemy, where the primary goal is to make the enemy come to terms through fear of repeat attacks rather than through destruction of its ability to fight.hmmm...interesting...naughty American Terrorists in 1945 for dropping Atomic Bombs on Japan...
And here's Russ' definition of a terrorist organization: 'an irregular or guerrilla group that as its usual means of fighting purposefully directs deadly violence against civilians intending to kill civilians.thats close.. but I've already discussed this... you'll have to catch up...