Google| Subject | Re: Re:The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an offence in Eng |
| From | Pradera |
| Date | 2002-04-30 19:22 (2002-04-30 19:22) |
| Message-ID | <aamjsf$2k9c$1@pingwin.acn.pl> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | T.T. Arvind |
U?ytkownik T.T. Arvind <ttarvind@vsnl.in>w wiadomo?ci do grup dyskusyjnych napisa?:aamiuq$35s$1@cpca7.uea.ac.uk...
T.T. Arvindwould
Russ <mcresq@aol.com>did boldly declaim: <snipped; response only required to a few points>Russ
Well, all war kills civilians, innocent or otherwise, meaning your view
Well that's more or less kind of pacifist-anarchist approach to war that I... approve :) And think about it - without army there are no civiliansessentially mean no offensive actions in a defensive was would be moral.T.T. Arvind
A war fought entirely on the battlefield would perhaps come close. A trial of arms by champion would be even better. Think of it - don't you think governments would immediately find a way to pursue policies of peaceful coexistence and co-operation if they knew that any dispute would *have* to be settled by a fight-unto-death between all the members of one government fighting all the members of another? At any rate, it's definitely better than having armies kill each other and civilians.
Pradera
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
