Google| Subject | Re: Israel and Palestine - Some myths exploded? (was Re: Republicanism still .. |
| From | Russ |
| Date | 2002-04-17 20:08 (2002-04-17 20:08) |
| Message-ID | <20020417140846.06878.00000622@mb-ch.aol.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | David Flood |
| Followups | David Flood (1d, 3h & 59m) |
In article <a9kd70$406g8$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de>, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>writes:
Ha! The more detailed the lie the more believable it is!David FloodYet the Israelis attacked first, rather than being in the position of
merelyaredefending themselves.If 80,000 troops mass on your border and kick out the UN Peacekeepers thatsuppsed to keep you apart, you're supposed to *wait* until they actually formally attack?Nevertheless - if the quotes are correct, and they seem to be detailed enough to be genuine
That's absurd. It's also stupid.
- there is considerable grounds for disputing the official Israeli version of history, and not just by Arabs.What's there to dispute? No one disputes that Nasser moved 80,000 troops to the Israeli border and kicked out the UN peacekeepers. No one disputes the IDF then attacked. And no one disputes the IDF won.
Russ
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
