Skip to main content
news

Re: Republicanism still an ...

Russ
SubjectRe: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of
FromRuss
Date2002-04-15 15:45 (2002-04-15 15:45)
Message-ID<20020415094541.18297.00000712@mb-fp.aol.com>
Client
Newsgroupsalt.fan.tolkien
FollowsMorgil Blackhope
FollowupsMorgil Blackhope (1h & 6m) > Russ

In article <a9dbi7$28ss4$1@ID-81911.news.dfncis.de>, "Morgil Blackhope" <morestelx@hotmail.com>writes:

Morgil Blackhope
Russ kirjoitti viestiss? <20020414171637.01774.00001297@mb-cg.aol.com>...

In article <a9cr2o$24iv6$1@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de>, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>writes:

"Flame of the West" <jsolinasNoSpam@erols.com>wrote in message news:3CB9CC02.4928E074@erols.com...

Well, let's not forget that Israel tried pretty hard to achieve a peace settlement before all this started.

*Yitzhak Rabin* and his faction tried it, and he paid the ultimate price

for

his efforts - at the hand of a right-wing Israeli assassin - remember?

And Barak tried it. What did he get for his trouble? The Palestinians

went to

war and ensured his defeat in favor of Sharon.

You don't think that had anything to do with Barak saying one thing and doing exactly opposite?

Boy that would be an incredible case of pot kettle black if the Palestinians made that argument.

Answer this: If Barak honestly wanted peace with Palestineans, why did he kept building illegal settlements on their lands, more then any other PM before him?

(And please, nothing about how Israel had a right to do that because they won, or that Palestineans deserved it. Just simply, what were his motives?)

Ask him.

You've dodged that main point. Whatever problems the Palestinians may have had with Barak, he was infinitely better than Sharon.

Russ