Subject | Re: OT:Christianity |
From | Pradera |
Date | 2002-05-02 16:55 (2002-05-02 16:55) |
Message-ID | <aark1g$1nmi$1@pingwin.acn.pl> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien,rec.arts.books.tolkien |
Follows | James Bell |
Followups | AC (3m) > Pradera |
James Bellreligious
AC wrote:AC
On Wed, 1 May 2002 16:19:50 -0400, "James Bell" <jamesb@naxs.com> wrote:James Bell
"AC" <spam@nospam.com>wrote in message news:3cd04361.72874988@news2.randori.com...ACJames Bell
On Wed, 1 May 2002 15:17:33 -0400, "James Bell" <jamesb@naxs.com> wrote:James BellAC
"AC" <spam@nospam.com>wrote in message news:3ccec08d.197127834@news2.randori.com...AC
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 04:18:47 -0400, Flame of the West <jsolinasNoSpam@erols.com>wrote:Flame of the West
David Sulger wrote:
Have you met any JWs. A large part of my family are JWs, and believe me, literal translations of Revelations are dangerous.
I don't believe literal translations are any more dangerous than
intolerance. Your post has made that much crystal clear to me.
I think I must have completely misunderstood you. Do you or do you notthink the
JWs interpretations of Revelation are dangerous? My interpretation of 'dangerous' is 'harmful'. I assert that interpreting Revelation literallyis no
more dangerous than religious intolerance, in fact, far less dangerous.Hmm don't they have that doctrine that forbids them to do blood transfusions? That seems pretty dangerous (mind you, it might be another myth I heard. I'm not so keen on JWs as others here are)