Subject | Re: The British Secret Service...[was Re: Republicanism still an offence in Eng |
From | Russ |
Date | 2002-04-23 22:06 (2002-04-23 22:06) |
Message-ID | <20020423160620.01774.00001903@mb-cg.aol.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | Michael O'Neill |
What's the motive? A 'black op' by toryphiles in the CIA? <g>Another example of this doublespeak is the FARC fiasco. First Sinn FeinMichael O'Neill
andthe IRA say they have no relation to those terrorist trainers. Then they reverse course and embrace them with all the attendant calls in theRepublicanNews to release the 'Columbia Three'. If the case of proven, let themrot.
In general I would agree. If the case be proven let them rot. I'd be a bit concerned about *who* is proving the case and what looks like evidence being planted or altered by the American investigators.
Yet there is a sneaking suspicion on my mind that the Columbia Three may *not* have been there to *promote* terrorism.That why I said 'if the case if proven'. If, as you opine, they were there to advise FARC on joining a peace process, that's a different story. However, I'd say that's a fairly unlikely "if". If they were there for that reason, why not say so?
Look at how far the IRA and the Northern Ireland Peace Process have got. Could the three IRA members have been there as "advisors", literally?
Advising the FARC guerillas on how to engage for political advantage as Gerry Adams et al have done? Could this be seen as anything other than peace-mongering? You can laugh if you want but ten years ago the thought of a peace process in Northern Ireland was a dream, nothing more.
I'm interested to see the resolution of this whole shebang.