Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | Russ |
Date | 2002-04-12 18:59 (2002-04-12 18:59) |
Message-ID | <20020412125948.20665.00000273@mb-mq.aol.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | paulh |
Followups | Morgil Blackhope (3h & 38m) > Russ paulh (1d, 12h & 29m) > Russ |
paulhMight does not make right. But, of course, sometimes might is right.
On 12 Apr 2002 14:39:35 GMT, mcresq@aol.com (Russ) wrote:couldWell, Egypt and Jordan did, to an extent. But a full recognition of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state must include a repudiation of any Palestinian right of return. This is simple logic, since any significant repatriation would doom Israel's Jewish character in the long run. We'll know the Arabs are serious about peace when they make room for the Palestinians in their own countries and let them out of the refugee prison camps.If the other Arab states wanted to to give the Palestinians a state theyhave any time prior to the 1967 War. Prior to that war, Egypt controlledtheGaza Strip and Jordan controlled the West Bank. I wonder why no one everasksthis question?was
Furthermore, Israel rightly took those areas in the 1967 war, since Israelbeing *attacked* from there. Isreal is under no obligation to return theminthe absence of a settled peace.So true... Israel was being attacked from there in 1967 so its only right that they can brutalise civilians in that area 35 years later. Might is Right and all..