Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
From | David Flood |
Date | 2002-04-19 00:49 (2002-04-18 23:49) |
Message-ID | <a9nll8$4ou2l$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
Follows | paulh |
Followups | paulh (6h & 25m) > David Flood |
paulh<snip>
On 18 Apr 2002 17:07:28 GMT, mcresq@aol.com (Russ) wrote:
Define 'some sort'. And, in an aside, it's what's called a 'war crime' (although not if you're on the winning side).Russpaulh
OK, so if a military plane drops a bomb on a target at noon crowded with civilians, it is not terrorism (although it may be something else)
Not if theres some sort of war going on its not...
number 4 inpaulhRussWhat about a car bomb of an army barracks? Is that ok?no
Why?
See previous answers/posts and put 2 and 2 together (hint.. keep the
mind)ofKeep the questions coming....Russ
Maybe using the Socratic method we can come up with a workable definition
terroristterrorism for you. <g>paulh
I already have one...RussWhat defines terrorism? The target? The means? Both? Neither?According to you its mathematics.
Actually, I've never said that. What I have argued is that military vs. civilians deaths is *evidence* as to whether a group can be termed a
Which brings us neatly back to "they're terrorists because they're terrorists".group or not.paulh
And I say its not. It merely a sample of whether they are efficient terrorists or not.
haveRusspaulh
Rather I have defined terrorist (broadly) as targeting civilians. See below.
thats part of it..luckily the British Army has rarely ever done that. Or
you any proof that they've ever been ordered to just go out and shoot anyold
person who wanders by?Have you, perchance, ever heard of the British Army's "Force Research Unit"? (I believe it's now going under a new name)