Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
| From | Russ |
| Date | 2002-04-18 19:21 (2002-04-18 19:21) |
| Message-ID | <20020418132112.07832.00001768@mb-mv.aol.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | paulh |
In article <u0vtbuk0ra0t4poif2ub53rfaqnp91l16a@4ax.com>, paulh <paulh@fahncahn.com>writes:
Right, but *by that definition* they are. As you will see in another message, I'm adopting your position that 'terrorism' can only apply to irregular or guerilla groups.In article <a9kj02$3dq$2@oravannahka.helsinki.fi>, Tamimpaulh
<hallaril@hotmail.com>writes:Not under my definitions you'll note....Russ <mcresq@aol.com>wrote:I know. Both are arguably terrorist acts by that definition.A common definition of terrorism I've seen around here is deadly violence purposefully directed against and intended to kill civilians.That would include Hiroshima and Dresden.
Russ
2002-03-30-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
