Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 05/01/2014 16:56 (05/01/2014 10:56) |
Message-ID | <u0n4m9pl657plueblnmrg19ufcrv9kltoo@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1m) > Tony Cooper |
SandmanI did anticipate this type of reply. Once again, Popinjay has pulled out a dictionary and found a definition that he *thinks* supports his position, but does anything but that.
In article <prj4m9d16ae2gioj7gqp2t3uiovmmi0q5f@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CooperEric StevensSandman
... and it is that to which you responded. Notice my use of the word 'implied'.
"imply" is somthing *I* do, "infer" is something *YOU* do. I didn't imply any such thing. Do you know how I know? Because I made the claim. You inferred it, and then claim I failed to substantiate something you only inferred.
Here we go again. Popinjay seems to think that he cannot imply something unless he intended to imply it.
imply verb (implies, implying, implied) [ with obj. ] indicate the truth or existence of (something) by suggestion rather than explicit reference