Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 04/29/2014 16:19 (04/29/2014 10:19) |
| Message-ID | <4ocvl9h23kqcso54li3gnretkifs7c4hiu@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (16m) > Tony Cooper |
On 29 Apr 2014 13:01:50 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanOh, so "non-standard" has nothing to do with a "standard"?
I've never claimed it is a part of any "standard", I am saying it is "the standard". There's a difference. I'm using it a noun that means "an idea or thing used as a measure, norm or model in comparative evaluations".
You have made the claim that Agent is a non-standard newsreader, but now you are claiming that your use of the word "standard" should not be taken to mean a part of any "standard"? Is that it?
If I follow this convoluted logic that you are trying to foist off on us, a "standard" is a measure, norm, or model in comparative evaluations. Therefore, Agent is a "standard" because we can use it as a measure, norm, or model in comparative evaluations.
So, Agent is both standard and non-standard. Doesn't the one rather neutralize the other?
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
04/14/2014-
