Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/26/2014 10:19 (04/26/2014 10:19) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllmr66.tpk.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (38m) > Sandman |
In article <vl6ll9p0qp4muv951elkr36aqft8hmube0@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
The subject is not what it was, but the thread is the same. You really are slow to understand these things. I'm sure you'll find a way to argue about this for weeks as well.Tony CooperSandmanTony CooperTony CooperSandman
The opening salvo came out of your popgun defense of your repeated error. It does take some audacity to claim you didn't "open" it when it's in a thread you opened.
Why can't you READ? Why is it so hard for you?? My first post in this thread was not part of any "debate", moron.
The thread is "Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)", and you initiated it.
It's the same thread. I just changed the subject line. Changing the subject line doesn't create a new thread. How ignorant are you??
Actually, it does. The clue is in "was". It is not what is was. It is something new.
I don't know how your newsreader presents the threads, but mine places this new thread far removed from the "was" thread.So you have a broken news reader. It doesn't become a new thread just because one of its readers have a broken news reader, Andreas.
Anyway, the whole idea of changing a subject line is to re-direct the conversation to something new. So, a new thread.No, same thread, new topic. "thread" says nothing about content.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
