Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 05/02/2014 09:05 (05/02/2014 09:05) |
Message-ID | <slrnlm6h44.5vn.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Tony Cooper (7h & 13m) > Sandman Eric Stevens (16h & 22m) |
Ok, now I am confused. As far as I can recall, the one who made the claim was Andreas:SandmanEric Stevens
Is there no end to your illiteracy? That is spoken by someone saying that there was no intended meaning. It is usually said when someone has inferred something that was not implied.
In the case which started all this, you could have done as in the example by explaining that you had not intended the meaning I had inferred. Instead you snipped the statement without saying anything about it. You certainly didn't correct my conclusion.
No need.Sandman
Andreas can't understand simple English Andreas: Why are you implying I can't understand anything? Sandman: I didn't mean to imply that you can't understand anything.Now, go lick your wounds and pretend this subthread never occured. You've made enough fool of yourself already.Eric Stevens
Why don't you just snip it and pretend it never existed?
Strange you won't support Andreas in this case?SandmanEric Stevens
"If a speaker or writer implies something, they are suggesting it in an indirect way rather than making an explicit statement."
Yep. True.