Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/26/2014 18:55 (04/26/2014 18:55) |
Message-ID | <slrnllnpd4.v9e.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Tony Cooper (5h & 32m) |
No, you did not show me misuing the word. You are now again lying about that.Sandman
Eric Stevens 11/28/2013 <s14d99tpigvh1jt1g2idvq17u7j8h16t9q@4ax.com>"The problem in this case is that neither of you properly understand the meaning of 'protocol'."That is an explicit claim from you about whether or not I understand a word. You were asked to provide support for this claim, which would be in the form of me 1. Using the word incorrectly, and 2. The correct usage of the word in that instance.That is the only way to support that claim.Eric Stevens
I'm not reopening this argument other than to say that I did all those things at great length but you rejected anything which didn't fit your idea of what was correct.
Not examples of me misusing the term, liar.Sandman
Eric Stevens 12/08/2013 <3qo7a9lmda3fn6mt5dqquo89aifqqkml16@4ax.com>"I gave you four written examples of the real-world use of the word 'protocol' and you ignored them."But that's side-stepping the claim, merely pointing to supposed correct usage of the word does not in any way, shape or form, support your claim that *I* don't understand it.Eric Stevens
For examples of 2. above and you rejected them.
No quotes of you knowing I made a mistake, told me about it and me ignoring it. You lose. Again.SandmanEric Stevens
Not at all - what I am *denying* is that YOU knew I was making a mistake, told me about it, and I ignored it.
See my long post with quotes.
That's irrelevant. No one told me anything at the time, which you are well aware of.SandmanEric Stevens
Exactly my point. No one thought I mistyped or made a mistake. No one thought "wait, maybe he's mixing things up?", and certainly no one said anyting to make me aware of me maybe having them mixed up.
A number of us suspected you were mixing things up but none of us could actually know what you really intended.
You are now lying again. You have been shown that this is incorrect, yet you persist making an incorrect claim.Sandman
Even if you did, you never ever said anything to me to enlighten me about it. If you knew I was saying B&H when I meant something else and then didn't say that, then that just makes you an asshole, right? Why didn't you just say "Uh, I think you may mean something else than B&H, it only exists in NY, and you're in Florida, right?"But you didn't, did you?Eric Stevens
You were told.
Your first correct claim in this post.SandmanEric Stevens
No, I knew it was Best Buy the entire time. I specifically drove there to visit Best Buy, my mistake was that when I wanted to reference Best Buy in this group, I mistakenly wrote B&H. That's my only mistake.
And you did it over and over again.
I have done extensive online shopping - from Swedish stores. You know, it saves chipping and custom costs.Eric StevensIf you have had any significant interest in photography and an Internet connection you should have known for some time.Sandman
That's a pretty stupid claim to make. I have significant interest in photography, but no interest in camera stores in the states, even if they have an online store.
That's suggests you have done little online shopping until recently.
Here's the sum: 0Eric StevensSee my recent post on this subject. You had (possibly) half a dozen warnings.Sandman
Incorrect.
Count them.