Skip to main content
news

Re: Will Tony apologize? (w...

Eric Stevens
Google Google
SubjectRe: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)
FromEric Stevens
Date04/22/2014 11:22 (04/22/2014 21:22)
Message-ID<foccl9tfd423tn4ck8157e0bhvg03tvi2v@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
On 22 Apr 2014 05:25:18 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <315bl9te9lipia78r21c87522tgqs4ssra@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

No I haven't. I only ever called you a liar when you have repeated a claim I have already proven incorrect.

Eric Stevens
See your Message-ID: <slrnlbbbcg.tcn.mr@irc.sandman.net> <snip>

Sandman
Yes, you're right. You used to lie so much that I naturally assumed that every claim you made was a lie. I had forgotten about that. I was referring to a period where you at least had some credibility left. That was LONG ago though.

You are bullshitting. This was your first major entry into the group. At that time you had no knowledge of how often I lied, if at all.

Eric Stevens
You might have forgotten all this but I can assure you that I haven't.

Sandman
It burns when your lies are exposed, doesn't it?

I've just exposed two of yours. You never proved my claim was incorrect. Further, in refusing to look at my evidence you showed how you can weasel around your claim that "I *ALWAYS* admit to my errors when they are shown to me. 100% of the times."

Incorrect. I *ALWAYS* admit to my errors when they are shown to me. 100% of the times. What you are referring to is when you CLAIM I am wrong, but are unable to support that claim.

Eric Stevens
" ... when they are shown to me". And when you look.

Sandman
Of course. I have to "look" to see stuff, you know. What use was this comment?

Because you refused to look. Have already forgotten what you wrote?

I don't lie, period.

Eric Stevens
False.

Sandman
Prove it, or apologize.

Here Eric had the integrity to do neither. He couldn't prove it and he refused to apologize.

You idiot. I've just quoted an example of where you have lied.

Eric Stevens
Bugger the percentages. You haven't even tried to determine the scale the plan is drawn to. How can you even begin to estimate the area devoted to photography if you haven't done that?

Sandman
Because I was there, that's how estimates are done.

The scale the plan is drawn to is irrelevant when calculating percentages.

Eric Stevens
And 99% of nothing much is still very small. The whole store is claimed to 15,000 sq.ft (approx 150 sq metres) so (say) 30% 4500 sq.ft which is not the area of a small store.

Sandman
I assume you mean 16%.

16% of 15,000 sq ft is not 4,500 sq ft. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens