Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/18/2014 04:30 (04/18/2014 04:30) |
| Message-ID | <slrnll13mp.c2d.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Whisky-dave |
| Followups | Whisky-dave (7d, 10h & 20m) |
In article <afab7373-f8c4-429c-a86a-5decc7660ffb@googlegroups.com>, Whisky-dave wrote:
The Tardis is bigger on the inside, Dave.SandmanWhisky-dave
Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.
In what way do you mean smaller on the inside like the Tardis ?
And I mean only small.
I have no problem understanding it, I just doesn't seem to have a use for it, and I can't understand why it was written in a reply to me.Whisky-daveEric StevensSandman
Physically they are not large but judging by what they do, they are quite a big store. At least they feel that way to me.
I'm not sure what I should do with this information.
Understand it......
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
