Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 04/17/2014 00:56 (04/16/2014 18:56) |
Message-ID | <9j2uk9ha0peiesffrv8ncganuris6lihec@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Savageduck |
SavageduckAs our Brit friends might say, "He knows bugger-all about size".
On 2014-04-16 13:34:11 +0000, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>said:SandmanSavageduck
In article <s69rk9dqeaov7ksrm8v5uo7cpkrpn5ln81@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanFrom recommendation from Tony, I went to Colonial Photo and Hobby, just to check it out. Was a really small store with one half hobby and the other photo-related stuff. Pretty cramped, but really nice british salesman that I talked to.Eric Stevens
Here is their web site. It gives some idea of their size. http://www.colonialphotohobby.com/index.htm
Uh, yeah? I was there, remember? It was a tiny store. Why is this a problem for you? Do you have some form of pride invested into the size of this store? Why? What's it to you?
Size is a relative thing, especially if you judge by the size of B&H or similar.
Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.
"bugger"???
"...B&H was also very tiny."???
None of that response makes any sense at all.