Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
From | nospam |
Date | 04/17/2014 18:56 (04/17/2014 12:56) |
Message-ID | <170420141256252548%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
i have, and it's not just best buys.Tony CooperTony CooperSandman
You, however, use the broad brush without actually checking.
You mean, other than his explicit claim about: "I'd estimate that in somewhere around half the visits", which means that he has at least visited enough stores for a number of them being "about half", which puts it roughly in at least around ten stores (4/10 is "about half"), so he already has ten times as much statistical data than you (i.e. infintaely more, since you have none).
Whoa, there. Where do you get that he's visited more than one store? He doesn't say that. You're reading something into to it that isn't there.
His statement could refer to three visits to one store. nospam rarely uses specifics; he usually used hand-waves like "most", "a lot", and such. Usually with asterisks that are supposed to give his meaningless claim some emphasis.it's for bold, italic and underline.
You're just making shit up.that's what you do.