Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/27/2014 12:36 (04/27/2014 12:36) |
Message-ID | <slrnllpnin.31b.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | sid (34m) > Sandman Tony Cooper (5h & 16m) > Sandman |
See what I mean about illiteracy? I never claimed it was - I used a scenario for your jumbled up idiotic sentence.Eric StevensSandman
You are somewhat dumb. What Tony wrote was logically correct even if it was slightly complicated to understand.
No, it wasn't logically correct. But I do understand that you would come in to defend him. Trust me, he needs all the help he can get. He's total road kill by now.He's basically saying that "After someone (Tony) who wanted to do (backup files) what the requirement requires (attach backup disk) adds it as a requirement" which is totally illogical.Tony Cooper
What? The sentence in question did not refer to a backup
It refers to the nature of a what a "requirement" is.No, it doesn't. Because you do not understand what a requirement is.
Think from global to specific and you may be able to understand that it is a clear and accurate statement.Keep telling yourself that.
Do laptops require a password to entered to access the system?No, they do not.
Yes, if the requirement has been added because the owner wants the requirement to be present.Incorrect. The user wants added security, not just add a password prompt for the sake of a password prompt. One of the options the user has is to enable password logins.