Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/29/2014 14:52 (04/29/2014 14:52) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllv89g.be5.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (12h & 4m) > Sandman |
In article <ftrul952j5jg1ijue6t01i8h6jmetbfjgn@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
So all these news clients are showing a thread incorrectly:Sandman
No need - I am questioning YOUR definition. And why can't you answer the question? It's simple enough.Is a thread based on the subject or the References header?Eric Stevens
To the reader, it is based primarily on the subject. After all, that's what they are there for.
<
>
<
>
<
>
<
>
<
>
<
>
<
>
<
>Because, if it is as you say, they will confuse the *hell* out of "the reader", since they by default think it's a completely new and frshly created thread.
In spite of containing quoted text. In spite of clearly having a "Re: " in the subject line.
All these news clients, all wrong. Right?
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
