Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 05/03/2014 02:16 (05/02/2014 20:16) |
Message-ID | <p5d8m9pir6nar38mlbitrmib3pr5a5e8ai@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Sandman (14h & 37m) |
Eric StevensLet me assist you in the translation. There is a standard, but it exists only in the mind of Popinjay. The standard that exists in his mind has the requirement of being whatever he wants it to require, which is like all requirements.
On 2 May 2014 07:32:38 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanEric Stevens
In article <0gq5m99814jib1q0c9kks94vh4b6qdu3lc@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensEric StevensSandmanClassic unsubstantiated claim.Eric Stevens
Loud Hyena laugh! You have consistently failed to substantiate your claim that there is some official standard that Agent does not comply with. Maybe five times now.
Produce a quote of me claiming there is an "official standard", Eric.
Down to quibbling over words are you now?Maybe English is too complicated for you.Sandman
You said I failed to substantiate a claim I never made.
OK, so you don't claim there is an official standard.
Not for displaying articles in a UI, no.Eric StevensSandman
Presumably, then, there isn't one.
Nope. But there *is* a standard. Just not "official", since pretty much nothing is "official" (no one "owns" usenet).
So now you have fallen back to not following the crowd.
But so what?