Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/18/2014 13:07 (04/18/2014 13:07) |
Message-ID | <slrnll2206.dge.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Savageduck |
Followups | Tony Cooper (34m) > Sandman Eric Stevens (11h & 2m) > Sandman |
SavageduckSandmanSavageduckEric StevensSandman
Size is a relative thing, especially if you judge by the size of B&H or similar.
Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.
"bugger"???
Bigger.
OK! A typo.
B&H's camera section was tiny. I wasn't talking about the entire store, just as I didn't include the size of the entire Colonial store either, since it's some 70% hobby things like model airplanes and such.Savageduck"...B&H was also very tiny."???None of that response makes any sense at all.Sandman
Why not?
"...B&H was also very tiny."?? Those are your words aren't they? If you consider B&H "very tiny" what exactly do you consider a large store?
B&H is a massive store, the furthest from *very tiny* that anybody could possibly imagine. Take a look at their store information video at full screen.I am fully aware of the size of B&H. I was at on in the Florida Loop. It wasn't "massive", but sure, it's a big store. MediaMarkt in Europe is bigger though, at least that the one in the Loop. BUt, I was only in reference to their tiny camera section, which had some 5-6 SLR bodies, some 10+ P&S and some other assorted cameras.