Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/28/2014 23:11 (04/28/2014 23:11) |
Message-ID | <slrnllth60.9ia.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 12m) > Sandman Tony Cooper (3h & 28m) > Sandman |
Yep! I don't know how one "breaks" a thread.Eric StevensSandmanSandman
<snip>Eric StevensYou didn't answer! Tell me, Eric - did I create a new thread? Why won't you answer?Let me ask you - is this a new thread as well, by the way?
As far as I am concerned, you broke the thread.
So, did I create a new thread? That's the question. The question above, that starts with "Let me ask you", was that an entirely new thread to you?
Is 'breaking the thread' a new concept to you?
You changed the subject from:
Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) to: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)Well, it was the other way around.
,,, by removing the "Re: " and also one "?".Incorrect. I did not remove the "Re: ", and I *added* a question mark, I didn't remove one.
With the way I have Agent configured (did you actually look at that URL?), it recognised that the subject had changed and set it up as a new thread. You will be pleased to know that it maintained the current (truncated) list of references.I'm not asking how Agent *displays* it, I am asking you if adding one question mark to the subject line "creates a new thread" according to YOU. One small character, full references and "sequence" or articles it follows and the exact same subject (i.e. meaning) but with one added character.