Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Savageduck |
| Date | 04/18/2014 16:43 (04/18/2014 07:43) |
| Message-ID | <2014041807431394298-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | J. Clarke (14m) |
On 2014-04-18 11:22:54 +0000, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>said:
SandmanYou understand that up until this morning you have been talking about B&H, not Best Buy? Read your original statement and all your subsequent remarks until this AM.
In article <2014041720193654426-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck wrote:SandmanSavageduckTony CooperSandman
Something like 5,000 people a day shop at B&H. How would you fit them in a "tiny" store.
I'm sure the camera section of B&H actually is significantly larger than colonial, when comparing area, but smaller when it comes to actual photorelated merchandise.
You can't possibly be serious, unless you were in Bob & Harry's photo store. You don't sound as if you actually visited B&H Photo Video.
Huh? Are you saying that the Best Buy at 1620 W Osceola Pkwy has a much larger camera section than I am claiming it does? Why on earth would I lie about that? IN fact, have I ever lied at any point? (Hint: no).
On 16 Apr 2014, in message <slrnlkt1r0.743.mr@irc.sandman.net>you stated: "Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny."
It might have a "B" in its name, but Best Buy is no B&H.
The camera section in this Best Buy was small, they had very few SLR bodies around, and a very small selection of P&S cameras as well.So, who ever claimed that Best Buy was a comprehensive camera store?
I got a pretty good deal when I bought a TV at our local Best Buy, but it is one of the last places I would think of going for any photo related stuff.
-- Regards,
Savageduck
04/14/2014-
