Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 05/01/2014 09:08 (05/01/2014 09:08) |
Message-ID | <slrnlm3ssm.lku.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 59m) > Sandman Whisky-dave (3h & 12m) > Sandman Tony Cooper (7h & 6m) > Sandman Tony Cooper (7h & 20m) > Sandman |
Eric Stevens
You are a dishonest lying baboon!
I originally wrote and you deleted:
"imply" is somthing *I* do, "infer" is something *YOU* do. I didn't imply any such thing. Do you know how I know? Because I made the claim. You inferred it, and then claim I failed to substantiate something you only inferred.Eric StevensSandman
What you have implied is that there is some official standard that Agent does not conform with. You have yet to substantiate that.
... and it is that to which you responded. Notice my use of the word 'implied'.
You can "point out" anything that exists only in your fantasy.SandmanEric Stevens
You said I failed to substantiate a claim I never made.
I've pointed out previously that you tend to put up a great cloud of squink with the intention that your meaning will slowly congeal and drip from it.
You use this as part of a debating trick to enable you to deny that you never used particular words which express that meaning more concisely.It's the other way around. You infer meaning from me that I never said or implied, then you're claiming - incorrectly - that I've said those things or that I haven't supported them. Of course I haven't, they're your invention!
You have repeatedly described Agent as 'non-standard', 'non-compliant', 'broken' or words to that effect.Do not use quote marks unless you're quoting someone. "Or words to that effect" is YOUR trolling weasaling. You and Andreas are peas in a pod. You never look up facts and just go "You said X or whatever".