Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Whisky-dave |
Date | 04/29/2014 17:10 (04/29/2014 08:10) |
Message-ID | <04aa6bd9-d839-4a64-a84f-918422a09255@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (3m) > Whisky-dave |
SandmanNothing to do with security, the genral public safety concerns but dor some maybe the words security and safety mean the same.
In article <vccvl9dfjo04nn3urh63obn9tf4hus648m@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CooperEric StevensSandman
No it wouldn't. It would read 'Person A needs to submit a password'.
EXACTLY! He *needs* to submit a password, that need is not born from desire, it is born out of a requirement.
And what, exactly, was the requirement or "need" born from? Why is that requirement in place?
Because someone wanted added security.
yes I agree with that who wants more and yet more passwords to rememeber. Apple wasn't teh first to use finger prints instead of passwords or codes.Tony CooperSandman
Anytime a password is a requirement, the requirement is in place because someone desired that a password requirement be in place.
No one wanted a password, they wanted added security.
The password was a means to an end, not the object of desire.No one really wants passwords, they want security and passwords are usually the easiest way of achiving this for some things but not others. Most people in fact almost everyone uses some sort of key to enter their home or car.
This is English, so I know you won't understand it.